Blog · 22 Oct 2026 · Data as of 19 Oct 2026

Claimed vs reported revenue, gross vs net

Every revenue figure on the scoreboard links to its source and shows its basis and as-of date, because "revenue" means different things depending on who is reporting it and how. Here is what each lab's number actually is, and isn't.

Claimed vs reported

The methodology's rule: when a company or its investors push a higher number than what is later reported, the board shows both and scores the reported one.

The clearest case is OpenAI. An annualized figure near $70B had circulated to investors. Axios reported on 8 Oct 2026 that OpenAI's actual annualized run rate is about $50B, counting only OpenAI's retained share of partner sales (such as Azure), roughly $20B less than the earlier figure. The scoreboard shows $70B as "claimed" and scores the $50B "reported" figure.

Moonshot AI (Kimi) has a milder version of the same pattern, but it's a forward target rather than an inflated past figure: Bloomberg, via Silicon Republic (6 Oct 2026), reports Moonshot's current ARR at about $1B, with the company targeting $2B ARR by December 2026. The $2B is labeled "claimed" because it hasn't happened yet, not because it's disputed.

Gross vs net accounting

Anthropic and OpenAI both sell through cloud partners, but they count that revenue differently. Anthropic books partner sales gross; OpenAI nets out the partner's retained share. That means Anthropic's $67.2B annualized figure (Q3 2026 revenue of $16.8B, told to investors 14 Oct 2026, per CNBC) and OpenAI's $50B are not directly comparable even though both are "annualized revenue run rate." The methodology states this plainly: "Anthropic books some cloud-partner revenue gross and OpenAI books it net, so they're not perfectly comparable."

Quarter times 4: figures the site computes itself

Three labs' revenue figures on the board are not a run rate the company published, but the most recent quarter multiplied by 4:

A single quarter x 4 is an average, not a forecast, so it will lag a fast-growing company's actual pace and can overstate a shrinking one's.

Third-party estimates

DeepSeek's $1B annualized revenue figure (as of September 2026) comes from Sacra (a third-party estimate), not from DeepSeek itself. The scoreboard flags this explicitly: "This is an estimate, not a company disclosure." It sits in the same table as company-reported figures, but it carries a different kind of uncertainty.

Every revenue figure on the board

LabReported figureBasisAs ofSource
Anthropic$67.2BQ3 revenue x 4, gross accounting2026-09-30CNBC
OpenAI$50Bannualized run rate, net of partner share2026-09-30Axios
OpenAI (claimed)$70Bearlier investor-facing gross-up figure2026-10-08Axios
Alibaba (Qwen)$7.296BAI-related product revenue, June quarter x 42026-06-30Alibaba results
xAI$3.272BQ1 2026 segment revenue x 4, incl. X ads/subscriptions2026-03-31Morningstar (SpaceX S-1)
Mistral$1BARR, "slightly above $1B" per CFO2026-09-08WSJ
Moonshot (Kimi)$1Bcurrent ARR2026-10-06Silicon Republic (Bloomberg)
Moonshot (claimed)$2BARR expected by December, forward target2026-10-06Silicon Republic (Bloomberg)
DeepSeek$1Bannualized revenue, September, third-party estimate2026-09-30Sacra

Google DeepMind and Meta have no row here: both are divisions of public companies that don't disclose lab-level revenue. Z.ai (Zhipu) has none because no sourced financials have been gathered yet.

Sources

All blog posts →